Originally Posted by
Mudofale
What alleged statements did I make exactly? You were the one who said everything is satanic not I. Proof that symbols are not occult related? Triangles, they date back to before the greeks and romans, before the dawn of civilization and before the time of man kind. Yet they are occult related. So are circles, squares, and anything that has two sides to it.
Are you telling me that the symbols did not exist before the occult started using them? Just because a group of people start doing something and use that symbol as their idea, god or, deity does not mean that they have anything to do with to that occult or those people. That is where you are confusing the issue. You are too busy trying to piece together not coincidentals with beliefs, religions, and occults that you are massing everything together in a giant lump. Want to know what every occult and symbol have in common? They are all related to people, there for people are people in fact Satan them selves.
Want to know why? Satan only exist because we say so, we have no physical proof that he exist just stories, fables, and documents made by men saying that he exist. Take people out of the equation, what do you have? Nothing. Everything we see, do and, believe is based on our perception of reality. If I say I the sky is orange and I get everyone else in the world to say the sky is orange then the sky is in fact orange. Why? Because everyone believes it is orange because I said so, so they perceive the sky as orange. Satan exist because men say he does so, we perceive things to be related to Satan because we believe he exist. So on and so fourth. Where is my proof that he does not exist? Proving something does not exist is not the same thing as proving something does exist. I can only assume something does not exist because I have no physical evidence that they exist. Are you starting to get the picture yet? Trying to explain this as simply as I possiby can.
If you have evidence something exist then there is no need to prove it does not exist.
If you have no physical evidence to back a claim then you have all the right to believe that something does not exist and in fact it does not exist if you do not have evidence it does exist.
Merely seeing the outcome of an experiment changes it completely. If I close my eyes and throw a dart at a board and walk away from it without looking at the board I can assume that it landed smack dab in the middle of the board. Why? Because I did not see where it landed, there for my guess is as good as anyone else's guess who did not see it. I do not think I can sum this up in a more simple form. So I will just leave it there.