No, differences in race involves a lot more than skin color. There are well defined differences in limb proportions, rib cage size, hormone levels, muscle type, metabolism, alcohol tolerance, lactose tolerance, vulnerability to certain diseases, the list goes on. It all fits in very well with that would be advantageous in the environments the different races lived in during prehistoric time.
If you are interested in learning more about evolution, I think it would be best to learn from biologists, rather than...AfriSynergists. Does that sound reasonable?
I wouldn't be so sure of that being true. Athletic ability, body structure, hygiene, immune system & all that you listed varies only in gene & cirumstances. That's like saying all asians are better martial artist then any race, blacks are more athletic than any race, whites are smarter than any race & etc.
I never heard of AfriSynergist until you mentioned it but I don't believe we evolved from apes yet I do agree that our body structures were different in ancient times but to say it varied only in race makes darwin a racist since that was what he indoctrinated hitler, communist & religious leaders across the world to believe which is one of the many reasons why the world is in its negative social disorder. The only evolution I believe in is in its literal meaning that dosent apply to race.
Last edited by gemiwine; 10th June 2012 at 01:46 AM.
Varies in genes, but not by race? I got news for you buddy, race is dictated by genes. Evolution most definatly explains why there are different races and there's a ton of evidence to back it up, and you probably wont find that evidence in youtube videos by guys like the AfriSynergist in your first post.
No one believes we evolved from apes. That proves you dont know anything about evolution. You're getting it confused with the idea that humans and apes share a common ancestor.
I'm not sure how saying evolution can create different races makes you a racist. Can you explain this to me?
Can you also explain how Darwin indoctrinated Hitler if he died before Hitler was ever born?
Race is nothing more than a social concept that has zero to do with genes.
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=9581
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releas...SRD-071098.php
http://news.wustl.edu/news/Pages/184.aspx
http://academic.udayton.edu/race/01race/race.htm
http://www.omics-ethics.org/observat...o24_05_01.html
Parrots can talk like humans so we must share a common ancestor with them too. The origins of martial arts & eugenics derived from animals & domestication so if you really think about it, we share a common ancestor with animals period not just apes just because they visually ressemble more like us than any animal. Evolution only explains in its literal meaning how are physical appearances have changed over the centuries. Other than that what you listed only varies by individual so no race is no better nor worse than another race.
Darwin is the one who came up with the idea of race being less or more evolved than another which would sound racist to anyone. Hitler adopted the same beliefs of him including meaning other occultist which is his excuse for attempting to exterminate the weaker race of jews because his race was more superior.
Last edited by gemiwine; 10th June 2012 at 05:56 AM.
No, it would sound racist only to you, because you don't know what evolution is. All extant species are as evolved as each other. Slugs are as evolved as us. You've got it into your head that "evolved" means "improved" or something but it doesn't mean that. It's just to do with fitting into a natural environment.
Let's try it this way- Gemwine, you're retarded. If you want an example of a failure of natural selection, find a mirror.
@13
Humans & parrots mimic all the time & we have types of diseases & cancers in common with dogs. A gorilla is not the only animal that humans share in common with.
@eff
http://www.islamdenouncesantisemitism.com/thesocial.htm
http://www2.starexponent.com/news/20...pai-ar-331256/