PDA

View Full Version : Underage Argument Thread


pigman
28th October 2017, 08:11 PM
Stop clogging up the rest of the fucking forum. If you have something to say about underage people appearing in videos, this is now the place to say it.

I don't think we should share the content of anybody under 18. Maybe age of consent is lower where you are, but it's 18 for the rest of us and I don't want to risk losing this site. Also, that doesn't matter; the forum rules are the forum rules. If you have a problem with the forum rules, message a mod with a reasonable argument or something. Bitching about it in every other thread isn't going to solve anything.
effingbillgates
28th October 2017, 11:44 PM
Fairly obvious argument is this:

This is a sexual forum. No underage stuff should ever be shared here. A lot of kids here are shouting "But farts are not normally sexual, therefore it's fine to share clips of eight year olds farting!" but this is not an argument on a sexually-oriented fart fetish site. If your argument is that you like underage people because you are underage yourself, then you are too young to be here.

Perhaps the GE rules should be made more explicit somewhere; I don't know. But it bothers me that a few Gary Glitters are able to make GE (and the fart fetish more generally) look dodgy.
suspect09
29th October 2017, 03:01 AM
If the farter is under the age of 18, I don't want to see a video of them on here; it shouldn't be allowed. That's it. I think most people agree with that.

People are taking issue with this notion that a video with a mom farting with her kids present is now CP. It's a silly response to a rule that comes from good intentions and posting such a video does not make anyone a "gary glitter"; that's an obvious overreaction. Nobody thinks you're cool for passive aggressively accusing people of being a pedophile, but good for you I guess.

Context should be implemented because it's important. If it's a mom face farting a minor, hmmm, that's a pretty open shut case. If it's two pre-teen girls giggling and farting at a sleep over, get that shit out of here. If a video contains an underage bystander passing by in the background it can be easily edited or blurred out of the video. I think that's a fair response that most people can follow and doesn't break any rules, nor does it put the site in jeopardy.

Just my 2(YR OLD MINOR CHILD ILLEGAL XXX CALL THE COPS) cents.
Shoddragon
29th October 2017, 04:39 AM
didn't one the mods/admins suggest blurring the children out of videos like that anyway?
1313Jr.1313
29th October 2017, 09:55 AM
if the young'uns are removed from the clip before it's put up here then we don't exactly have underage folks in the clip and it's fine. if there ARE kids in any context, it doesn't belong on in porn and it doesn't belong on this forum.
suspect09
29th October 2017, 12:09 PM
if the young'uns are removed from the clip before it's put up here then we don't exactly have underage folks in the clip and it's fine. if there ARE kids in any context, it doesn't belong on in porn and it doesn't belong on this forum.

What if I take a sexy flatulence clip and then put a picture of me as a child in one frame of the video ala Fight Club (https://youtu.be/E1d5VvCa8Fo?t=41)?

Asking for a friend.
1313Jr.1313
29th October 2017, 06:34 PM
What if I take a sexy flatulence clip and then put a picture of me as a child in one frame of the video ala Fight Club (https://youtu.be/E1d5VvCa8Fo?t=41)?

Asking for a friend.

kid in clip at all = rule broken, whether it's one frame or a hardcore child gangbang. it's much simpler for everyone to have nonmoving goalposts
Dissia
29th October 2017, 09:09 PM
Great topic. Not intrested.

Keep talking on here, and please dont come to other topics.. just stay here and argue forever